Email ::

The email will read
Subject;
A friend has sent this link from
the National Priorities Web site
Body:
Title: World military spending
URL: http://nationalpriorities.org/node/5774

Print ::

Print

Send this page to your printer. A printer dialog will open in a moment after clicking.

Bookmark ::

Bookmark

Add this page to your Google, Del.icio.us, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Slashdot, etc... A NEW WINDOW will POP UP

Feed

Interet Explorer Users.
After clicking this link you will be brought to a feed page. Copy paste the URL to whatever feed program you use IE Google, Yahoo etc.
Firefox / Safari After clicking this link you will be brought to a feed page. Follow it's instructions

Embed

Use the following code to Embed this page into your site.
---paste after this line---
<iframe style="border:0px" src=http://iframe.nationalpriorities.org/node/5774 width=650px; height=1000px >
</iframe>
---paste above this line---
Click Here to see examples

World military spending

World military spending in 2005 reached $1.12 trillion with the U.S. accounting for almost half. NATO allies make up another 23% of spending, while Japan, S. Korea and Australia make up another 7% (included in the rest of the world slice). While accurate data for 2005 is not available for some of the countries labeled as the 'axis of evil' by the administration, it is likely that these countries - Cuba, Iran, Libya, N. Korea, Sudan and Syria make up only around 1% of world military spending.

Source: The figures, compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute are compared in constant ($2003) prices and market exchange rates.

Login or register to post comments
Send

( categories:

)

i dont understand the

Submitted by ashleigh (not verified) on Sat, 04/12/2008 - 23:01.

i dont understand the process of the graphs why is nato allies percentage less then the rest of the world and the united states i just dont understand i was wonderin if you could help me to understand and explain it to me and what are the percentage for the 2008 year?

NATO allies

Submitted by dmcleod on Thu, 04/17/2008 - 19:59.

The reason the NATO allies slice is smaller is because it highlights allies outside of the United States. The point is to show that our allies spend a lot, too. If the U.S. were included it would say 'NATO' rather than NATO allies.

Dan Mcleod

National Priorities Project

(to up date this click on my account and edit profile)